ATP Challenger Tour · 1st Round Qualifying · AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Tigre II
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ambrogi
🪃 Counterpuncher
Fernandez
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 54% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 3,919 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ambrogi | Fernandez |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–6 | 4–7 |
| Avg odds | 2.17 | 2.58 |
| ROI % | -11.1% | -56.2% |
| Units P/L | -1.56u | -6.18u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Ambrogi
0
Fernandez
Apr 27, 2026
M25 Lujan
C Clay · Round of 16
Feb 23, 2026
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Tigre II
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Ambrogi has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Fernandez's 30%).
| Opponent | Ambrogi | Fernandez |
|---|---|---|
| Guido Ivan Justo | L 36 06 | L 67 46 |
| Carlos Maria Zarate | W 62 16 64 | L 36 36 |
| Juan Bautista Torres | L 62 16 46 | L 57 46 |
| Thiago Cigarran | W 61 36 63 | W 64 64 |
| Lautaro Midon | L 62 36 57 | L 36 63 46 |
| Gonzalo Bueno | W 62 61 | L 26 57 |
| Franco Ribero | W 64 76 | L 63 16 57 |
| Valentin Basel | W 60 61 | W 62 67 63 |
| Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos | W 75 60 | W 63 46 76 |
| Juan Estevez | L 26 67 | L 57 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ambrogi | Fernandez |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62% | 63.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.3% | 62.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.6% | 49.3% |
| Aces / Match | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.7 | 3.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.1% | 52.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.2% | 39.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.9% | 53.6% |
| BP Converted % | 43.4% | 55.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16.5 | 19 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 37 | 47 |
| Net Pts Won % | 78.5% | 28.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 51.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 70% | 38% |
Last five matches per player
Guido Ivan Justo
CIT Open · Quarterfinals
Jun 14
Guido Ivan Justo
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Semifinals
Jun 13
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Final
Jun 13
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Copa Internacional de Tenis · Round of 32
Jun 12
Carlos Maria Zarate
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Nick Hardt
CIT Open · Round of 32
Jun 15
Nick Hardt
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 10
Nicolas Oliveira
M25 Cuiaba · Round of 32
Jun 1
Juan Bautista Torres
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · Round of 32
May 7
Murkel Dellien
Santos Brasil Tennis Cup · Round of 32
May 6
Matchup overview
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi and Bruno Fernandez face off in the 1st Round Qualifying at AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Tigre II on Clay.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Guido Ivan Justo (Jun 14).
Bruno Fernandez is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Nick Hardt (Jun 15).
Share this match
