WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,452 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Davis | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.83 |
| ROI % | - | -2.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.34u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
1
Davis
3
Ostapenko
Oct 17, 2022
Guadalajara 2
H Hard · Round of 64
May 9, 2022
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Jun 14, 2021
Birmingham
G Grass · Round of 32
Sep 21, 2020
Strasbourg
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Davis | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 58.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 66.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 43.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 7.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 58.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 56.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 53% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 56% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Lauren Davis and Jelena Ostapenko face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Lauren Davis leads 1-3 over 4 previous meetings.
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Jelena Ostapenko is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (May 27).
Share this match
