Grand Slam · Round of 64 · Australian Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Gibbs
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,284 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nicole Gibbs here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Gibbs |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Mladenovic
1
Gibbs
Mar 21, 2016
Miami
H Hard · Round of 64
Jan 18, 2016
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Gibbs |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Nicole Gibbs face off in the Round of 64 at Australian Open on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Nicole Gibbs is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Shelby Rogers (Jan 6).
Share this match
