WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Limoges
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gibbs
⚙️ Grinder
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,650 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Zidansek here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Gibbs
0
Zidansek
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gibbs | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nicole Gibbs and Tamara Zidansek face off in the Round of 32 at Limoges on Hard.
Nicole Gibbs leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nicole Gibbs is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Shelby Rogers (Jan 6).
Tamara Zidansek is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Elina Avanesyan (Jun 2).
Share this match
