WTA 500 · Round of 16 · Zhengzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Garcia
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 68% vs 🏃 Pusher across 519 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Caroline Garcia here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Mladenovic
1
Garcia
Sep 9, 2019
Zhengzhou
H Hard · Round of 16
May 13, 2019
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Jan 11, 2016
Sydney
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Caroline Garcia face off in the Round of 16 at Zhengzhou on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Caroline Garcia is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kamilla Rakhimova (Aug 25).
Share this match
