ATP Challenger Tour · 2nd Round Qualifying · Lille
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schepper
⚙️ Grinder
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Kenny De Schepper plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schepper | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.94 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -61.3% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -2.45u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Schepper
2
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schepper | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.2% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.6% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 35.6% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.3 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.9% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26.1% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.6% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 46.8% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 16 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 58.8% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.9% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kenny De Schepper and Cem Ilkel face off in the 2nd Round Qualifying at Lille on Hard.
Kenny De Schepper leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Kenny De Schepper is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Max Alcala Gurri (Jun 7).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
