ATP Challenger Tour · 1st Round Qualifying · Lugano
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Schepper
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Kenny De Schepper.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 1–3 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 2.94 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -61.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -2.45u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Ilkel
1
Schepper
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 65.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 64.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 35.6% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 4.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 51.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 26.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 45.6% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 46.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 16 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 30 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 58.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 44.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Kenny De Schepper face off in the 1st Round Qualifying at Lugano on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Kenny De Schepper is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Max Alcala Gurri (Jun 7).
Share this match
