WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Bacsinszky
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 54% vs 🤖 Servebot across 978 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Timea Bacsinszky here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | - |
| ROI % | +55.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +6.07u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Pliskova
1
Bacsinszky
Oct 8, 2018
Tianjin
H Hard · Semifinals
May 15, 2017
Rome
C Clay · Round of 16
Apr 16, 2016
Fed Cup WG SF: CZE vs SUI
H Hard · Round Robin
May 11, 2015
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Bacsinszky |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 75% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Karolina Pliskova and Timea Bacsinszky face off in the Round of 16 at Rome on Clay.
Karolina Pliskova leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Karolina Pliskova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Laura Siegemund (May 5).
Timea Bacsinszky is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kristie Ahn (Sep 16).
Share this match
