WTA 250 · Final · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Goerges
🤖 Servebot
Kasatkina
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,103 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Julia Goerges here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Goerges | Kasatkina |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 7–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.68 |
| ROI % | - | -34.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.11u |
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
4
Goerges
2
Kasatkina
Apr 2, 2018
Charleston
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Oct 16, 2017
Moscow
H Hard · Final
Oct 17, 2016
Moscow
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Sep 26, 2016
Wuhan
H Hard · Round of 64
Jul 20, 2015
Bad Gastein
C Clay · Round of 16
Jul 13, 2015
Bucharest
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Goerges | Kasatkina |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 71.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 40.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 44.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 48.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Julia Goerges and Daria Kasatkina face off in the Final at Moscow on Hard.
Julia Goerges leads 4-2 over 6 previous meetings.
Julia Goerges is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Laura Siegemund (Sep 28).
Daria Kasatkina is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Anna Blinkova (Jun 13).
Share this match
