WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Osaka
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,030 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jil Teichmann plays Naomi Osaka.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | 13–3 |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | 2.22 |
| ROI % | +123.4% | +57.8% |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | +9.25u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Teichmann
0
Osaka
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Osaka has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Teichmann's 75%).
| Opponent | Teichmann | Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | W 75 64 | W |
| Karolina Muchova | W | W 64 76 |
| Liudmila Samsonova | W 64 64 | W 46 76 63 |
| Sorana Cirstea | L 16 16 | W 63 46 62 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 59.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 65.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 47.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 3.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 46.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 41.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 55.4% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 67.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 52.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Naomi Osaka face off in the Round of 16 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Naomi Osaka is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Ekaterina Alexandrova (Jun 25).
Share this match
