WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Limoges
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jil Teichmann plays Jennifer Brady.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Brady |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | 2.19 |
| ROI % | +123.4% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Teichmann
1
Brady
Aug 10, 2020
Lexington
H Hard · Final
Dec 16, 2019
Limoges
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Brady |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 57.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 71.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 50.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 62.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 29.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 27.5% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 25% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 47.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Jennifer Brady face off in the Round of 16 at Limoges on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Share this match
