WTA 250 · Final · Lexington
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brady
🤖 Servebot
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jennifer Brady plays Jil Teichmann.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brady | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 13–5 |
| Avg odds | 2.19 | 3.44 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +123.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +22.21u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Brady
1
Teichmann
Aug 10, 2020
Lexington
H Hard · Final
Dec 16, 2019
Limoges
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brady | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.5% | 67.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.2% | 58.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.6% | 51.3% |
| Aces / Match | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.5% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 29.2% | 37.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 27.5% | 57.3% |
| BP Converted % | 25% | 43.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.8% | 51.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 67% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jennifer Brady and Jil Teichmann face off in the Final at Lexington on Hard.
Jennifer Brady leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Jennifer Brady is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gina Feistel (Apr 20).
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Share this match
