WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Adelaide
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Sevastova
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
Both Jil Teichmann and Anastasija Sevastova are 🎯 Baseliner types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 246 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Teichmann | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.44 | - |
| ROI % | +123.4% | - |
| Units P/L | +22.21u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Teichmann
1
Sevastova
May 10, 2021
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Feb 22, 2021
Adelaide
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Teichmann has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Sevastova's 0%).
| Opponent | Teichmann | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Simona Waltert | W 57 61 75 | L 36 36 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Teichmann | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 57.3% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 43.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 67% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jil Teichmann and Anastasija Sevastova face off in the Quarterfinals at Adelaide on Hard.
Jil Teichmann leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Anastasija Sevastova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aliona Falei (Nov 24).
Share this match
