WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sevastova
🎯 Baseliner
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
Both Anastasija Sevastova and Jil Teichmann are 🎯 Baseliner types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 246 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sevastova | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 13–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.44 |
| ROI % | - | +123.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +22.21u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Sevastova
1
Teichmann
May 10, 2021
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Feb 22, 2021
Adelaide
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Teichmann has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Sevastova's 0%).
| Opponent | Sevastova | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Simona Waltert | L 36 36 | W 57 61 75 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sevastova | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 67.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 51.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 43.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 51.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 79% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anastasija Sevastova and Jil Teichmann face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Anastasija Sevastova leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Anastasija Sevastova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aliona Falei (Nov 24).
Jil Teichmann is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 24).
Share this match
