ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Potchefstroom 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brooksby
🎾 All-Court
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
🎾 All-Court vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 224 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jenson Brooksby plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brooksby | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–8 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.21 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -74.6% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -6.71u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Brooksby
2
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Brooksby | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 70.7% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.6% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.5% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 3.7 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.5% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.8% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.2% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 42.1% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.6 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 18.2 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 60.7% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.1% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Jenson Brooksby and Cem Ilkel face off in the Quarterfinals at Potchefstroom 2 on Hard.
Jenson Brooksby leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Jenson Brooksby is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Francisco Cerundolo (Jun 17).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
