ATP Challenger Tour · 2nd Round Qualifying · Tiburon
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Brooksby
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs 🎾 All-Court is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 224 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Cem Ilkel plays Jenson Brooksby.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Brooksby |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 1–8 |
| Avg odds | 3.61 | 3.21 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -74.6% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -6.71u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Ilkel
2
Brooksby
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ilkel | Brooksby |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 53.9% | 70.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 67.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.2% | 53.5% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 3.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 71.4% | 57.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.9% | 36.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.4% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 100% | 42.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 17.6 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 18.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 60.7% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.8% | 52.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Cem Ilkel and Jenson Brooksby face off in the 2nd Round Qualifying at Tiburon on Hard.
Cem Ilkel leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Jenson Brooksby is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Francisco Cerundolo (Jun 17).
Share this match
