ATP 500 · Finals · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sinner
💥 Big Hitter
Tien
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 2,106 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Jannik Sinner plays Learner Tien.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 22–2 | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | 1.10 | 2.31 |
| ROI % | +1.1% | +3.9% |
| Units P/L | +0.27u | +0.50u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Sinner
0
Tien
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Sinner | Tien | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 92% | 22/24 | 93% | 13/14 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 16/24 | 93% | 13/14 |
| 5 or more | 42% | 10/24 | 93% | 13/14 |
| 10 or more | 13% | 3/24 | 50% | 7/14 |
| 15 or more | 13% | 3/24 | 7% | 1/14 |
| 20 or more | 4% | 1/24 | 7% | 1/14 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Sinner has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Tien's 50%).
| Opponent | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | W 61 64 | L 36 76 16 67 |
| Tomas Machac | W 61 67 63 | L 46 46 |
| Frances Tiafoe | W 62 62 | W 76 36 75 |
| Alex Michelsen | W 75 76 | L 46 26 |
| Corentin Moutet | W 61 64 | W 46 64 64 |
| Daniil Medvedev | W 76 76 | W 64 60 63 |
| Denis Shapovalov | W 63 62 | W 76 75 |
| Ben Shelton | W 63 64 64 | W 76 46 63 |
| Tommy Paul | W 16 60 63 | L 64 46 36 |
| Marin Cilic | W 62 62 | L 57 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sinner | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.6% | 63.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.8% | 74% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 51.1% |
| Aces / Match | 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 3.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 59.6% | 64% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 18.9% | 30.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 43% | 50.3% |
| BP Converted % | 19.9% | 48.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 13.8 | 29.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 23 | 33 |
| Net Pts Won % | 53.5% | 74.7% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.2% | 51.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 89% | 58% |
Last five matches per player
Carlos Alcaraz
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Final
Apr 12
Alexander Zverev
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Semifinals
Apr 11
Felix Auger-Aliassime
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Quarterfinals
Apr 10
Tomas Machac
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Round of 16
Apr 9
Ugo Humbert
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Round of 32
Apr 7
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship · Quarterfinals
Apr 3
Nishesh Basavareddy
Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship · Round of 16
Apr 2
Kamil Majchrzak
Miami Open presented by Itau · Round of 64
Mar 21
Jannik Sinner
BNP Paribas Open · Quarterfinals
Mar 12
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
BNP Paribas Open · Round of 16
Mar 10
Matchup overview
Jannik Sinner and Learner Tien face off in the Finals at Beijing on Hard.
Jannik Sinner leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Jannik Sinner is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Carlos Alcaraz (Apr 12).
Learner Tien is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Roman Andres Burruchaga (Apr 3).
Share this match
