WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Cincinnati
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mertens
💥 Big Hitter
Podoroska
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 1,018 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Elise Mertens here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mertens | Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–7 | 13–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.39 | 2.19 |
| ROI % | +49.9% | +86.1% |
| Units P/L | +8.48u | +13.77u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Mertens
0
Podoroska
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mertens | Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62% | 67.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.6% | 62.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.9% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 4.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.5% | 47.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39.8% | 45.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 56.2% |
| BP Converted % | 45.5% | 58% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 53.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 100% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elise Mertens and Nadia Podoroska face off in the Round of 64 at Cincinnati on Hard.
Elise Mertens leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Elise Mertens is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Naomi Osaka (Jun 23).
Nadia Podoroska is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon (Jun 19).
Share this match
