WTA 250 Β· Round of 32 Β· Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mertens
π₯ Big Hitter
Tsurenko
π§± The Wall
Matchup analysis
The π₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 62% vs π§± The Wall across 1,397 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Elise Mertens here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the wall's elite returner. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Mertens | Tsurenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10β7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.39 | - |
| ROI % | +49.9% | - |
| Units P/L | +8.48u | - |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
1
Mertens
1
Tsurenko
Jan 6, 2020
Shenzhen
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Jun 12, 2017
's Hertogenbosch
G Grass Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Mertens | Tsurenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 45.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elise Mertens and Lesia Tsurenko face off in the Round of 32 at Shenzhen on Hard.
Elise Mertens leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Elise Mertens is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Naomi Osaka (Jun 23).
Lesia Tsurenko is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Katie Boulter (Oct 7).
Share this match