WTA 1000 Β· Round of 64 Β· Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mertens
π₯ Big Hitter
Cibulkova
π― Baseliner
Matchup analysis
π₯ Big Hitter vs π― Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,030 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Elise Mertens plays Dominika Cibulkova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Mertens | Cibulkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10β7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.39 | - |
| ROI % | +49.9% | - |
| Units P/L | +8.48u | - |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 3 career meetings
1
Mertens
2
Cibulkova
Jul 2, 2018
Wimbledon
G Grass Β· Round of 32
Oct 2, 2017
Beijing
H Hard Β· Round of 64
Aug 21, 2017
New Haven
H Hard Β· Semifinals
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Mertens | Cibulkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.6% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 45.5% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Elise Mertens and Dominika Cibulkova face off in the Round of 64 at Beijing on Hard.
Elise Mertens leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Elise Mertens is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Naomi Osaka (Jun 23).
Dominika Cibulkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (May 27).
Share this match