ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Burnie
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Popko
🛡️ The Spoiler
O'Connell
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 62% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,609 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Christopher O'Connell here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Popko | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–3 | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | 2.35 | 2.36 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -25.3% |
| Units P/L | -3.00u | -3.04u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Popko
1
O'Connell
Jan 8, 2020
Noumea
H Hard · Round of 32
Feb 2, 2017
Burnie
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Popko | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 56.7% | 59.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 62.8% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.2% | 48.7% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 7.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 53.4% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 41.8% | 24.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 47.8% | 43.2% |
| BP Converted % | 52.4% | 54% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 26.1 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 29.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 61.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.2% | 46.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 64% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Dmitry Popko and Christopher O'Connell face off in the Quarterfinals at Burnie on Hard.
Dmitry Popko leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Dmitry Popko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alvaro Lopez San Martin (Jun 19).
Christopher O'Connell is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Otto Virtanen (Jun 19).
Share this match
