ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Oeiras Open 3
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tseng
⚔️ The Gladiator
McDonald
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 56% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 2,688 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Mackenzie McDonald here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tseng | McDonald |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–8 | 3–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.69 | 2.59 |
| ROI % | -28.6% | -38.7% |
| Units P/L | -4.29u | -4.26u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Tseng
0
McDonald
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
McDonald has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Tseng's 17%).
| Opponent | Tseng | McDonald |
|---|---|---|
| Moez Echargui | W 64 16 63 | W 62 75 |
| David Goffin | L 36 16 | W 64 64 |
| Rei Sakamoto | L 57 16 | L 46 36 |
| Martin Landaluce | L 57 36 | W 36 62 75 |
| Luciano Darderi | L 57 06 | L 67 76 46 |
| Mattia Bellucci | L 26 16 | W 61 67 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Tseng | McDonald |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.9% | 65.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 63.8% | 59.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 44.8% | 48.3% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 1.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.4 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 49.5% | 52.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 33.3% | 26.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.2% | 47.5% |
| BP Converted % | 48.4% | 32% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.4 | 15.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 29.6 | 30.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 69.9% | 62% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.9% | 45.3% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 47% | 14% |
Last five matches per player
Timofey Skatov
Internazionali di Tennis Città di Perugia | G.I.MA. Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 4
Moez Echargui
Internazionali di Tennis Città di Perugia | G.I.MA. Tennis Cup · Round of 32
Jun 2
Lautaro Midon
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Round of 16
May 28
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Round of 32
May 26
Lukas Neumayer
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Semifinals
May 26
Rinky Hijikata
Lexus Birmingham Open · Round of 16
Jun 4
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Lexus Birmingham Open · Round of 32
Jun 3
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Daniel Merida
Internazionali BNL d'Italia · 1st Round Qualifying
May 4
Lloyd Harris
Mutua Madrid Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 20
Match summary
Chun-Hsin Tseng and Mackenzie McDonald meet in the Round of 32 at the Oeiras Open 3 on clay on April 14, 2026. Tseng enters ranked 159th, while McDonald holds the higher ranking at 123rd. The two players have never faced each other before, so there is no established head-to-head record between them.
Recent form tells a mixed story for both competitors. Over their last ten matches, each player has won half their contests, though both have stumbled in their most recent five outings. Chun-Hsin Tseng is working through a four-match losing streak after taking fifteen days off, while Mackenzie McDonald brings a two-match slide but has played twice in the past two weeks and should carry more rhythm into this match.
On clay, the surface for this tournament, the contrast is stark. Tseng has compiled a 60% win rate on the red dirt over recent clay events, adapting well to the slower conditions. McDonald, by contrast, has struggled significantly on clay with just a 20% win rate, winning only four of his last sixteen matches on this surface.
The two players rely on different approaches. Tseng operates as a counterpuncher, using timing and positioning to neutralize opponents' pace. McDonald is a big hitter who depends on power and aggression to dictate play. Both have faced some shared opponents recently, trading wins and losses against common foes.
Share this match
