ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 64 · Tampere
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
O'Connell
🤖 Servebot
Sultanov
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Christopher O'Connell here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | O'Connell | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | 3–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.36 | 1.54 |
| ROI % | -25.3% | -2.5% |
| Units P/L | -3.04u | -0.10u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
O'Connell
0
Sultanov
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | O'Connell | Sultanov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.8% | 58.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.6% | 75.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 53.6% |
| Aces / Match | 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.1% | 64.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 24.5% | 21.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 43.2% | 41.3% |
| BP Converted % | 54% | 10% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 26.1 | 21 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 29.2 | 10 |
| Net Pts Won % | 61.8% | 100% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.4% | 47% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Christopher O'Connell and Khumoyun Sultanov face off in the Round of 64 at Tampere on Clay.
Christopher O'Connell leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Christopher O'Connell is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Otto Virtanen (Jun 19).
Khumoyun Sultanov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Fajing Sun (Apr 16).
Share this match
