ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
O'Connell
🤖 Servebot
Palan
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Christopher O'Connell and Dominik Palan are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 13,712 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | O'Connell | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | 3–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.36 | 3.38 |
| ROI % | -25.3% | -40.6% |
| Units P/L | -3.04u | -3.65u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
O'Connell
0
Palan
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | O'Connell | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 59.8% | 63% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.6% | 76% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 54.2% |
| Aces / Match | 7.2 | 10.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 3.9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.1% | 63.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 24.5% | 23.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 43.2% | 50.8% |
| BP Converted % | 54% | 35.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 26.1 | 30 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 29.2 | 23 |
| Net Pts Won % | 61.8% | 50% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.4% | 50.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 56% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Christopher O'Connell and Dominik Palan face off in the Round of 32 at Guangzhou on Hard.
Christopher O'Connell leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Christopher O'Connell is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Otto Virtanen (Jun 19).
Dominik Palan is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs John Sperle (Jun 21).
Share this match
