WTA Finals · Round of 16 · Parma
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Garcia
🤖 Servebot
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Caroline Garcia plays Anna Lena Friedsam.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Garcia | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.45 |
| ROI % | - | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.47u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Garcia
0
Friedsam
May 17, 2021
Parma
C Clay · Round of 16
Jun 13, 2016
Mallorca
G Grass · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Garcia | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 72.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 69% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Caroline Garcia and Anna Lena Friedsam face off in the Round of 16 at Parma on Clay.
Caroline Garcia leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Caroline Garcia is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kamilla Rakhimova (Aug 25).
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Share this match
