WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Garcia
🤖 Servebot
Kalinina
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 🎾 All-Court is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 641 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Caroline Garcia plays Anhelina Kalinina.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Garcia | Kalinina |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.70 |
| ROI % | - | -18.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.73u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Garcia
0
Kalinina
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kalinina has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Garcia's 0%).
| Opponent | Garcia | Kalinina |
|---|---|---|
| Kamilla Rakhimova | L 46 64 36 | W 62 57 62 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Garcia | Kalinina |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 60.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 58.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 47.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 53.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Caroline Garcia and Anhelina Kalinina face off in the Round of 16 at Beijing on Hard.
Caroline Garcia leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Caroline Garcia is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kamilla Rakhimova (Aug 25).
Anhelina Kalinina is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mccartney Kessler (Jun 24).
Share this match