ATP Challenger Tour · 3rd Round Qualifying · Quimper
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Karatsev
🎯 Baseliner
Karlovskiy
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,419 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Aslan Karatsev here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Karatsev | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.40 |
| ROI % | - | -44.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.34u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Karatsev
1
Karlovskiy
Nov 12, 2020
Ortisei
H Hard · Round of 16
Feb 3, 2020
Pune
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 30, 2017
Quimper
H Hard · 3rd Round Qualifying
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Karatsev | Karlovskiy |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.8% | 73.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 82.5% | 66% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 31.6% | 44% |
| Aces / Match | 11 | 2.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 75% | 61.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 50% | 24.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.5% | 52.9% |
| BP Converted % | 62.5% | 51.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 61.1% | 48% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 100% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Aslan Karatsev and Evgeny Karlovskiy face off in the 3rd Round Qualifying at Quimper on Hard.
Aslan Karatsev leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Aslan Karatsev is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Christian Djonov (Apr 13).
Evgeny Karlovskiy is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Robin Catry (May 18).
Share this match
