WTA 500 · Final · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kerber
🏹 Frontrunner
Keys
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🏹 Frontrunner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Angelique Kerber plays Madison Keys.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kerber | Keys |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 12–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.13 |
| ROI % | - | +68.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +10.94u |
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
5
Kerber
1
Keys
Aug 13, 2018
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 15, 2018
Australian Open
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Oct 24, 2016
Singapore
H Hard · Round Robin
Aug 8, 2016
Olympics
H Hard · Semifinals
Mar 21, 2016
Miami
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Apr 6, 2015
Charleston
C Clay · Final
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kerber | Keys |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 43.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 43.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 39% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54.7% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 56.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 52.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 78% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Angelique Kerber and Madison Keys face off in the Final at Charleston on Clay.
Angelique Kerber leads 5-1 over 6 previous meetings.
Angelique Kerber is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Qinwen Zheng (Jul 29).
Madison Keys is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jessica Pegula (Jun 19).
Share this match
