ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Samarkand
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Setkic
⚙️ Grinder
O'Connell
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Christopher O'Connell here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Setkic | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–2 | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | 1.59 | 2.36 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -25.3% |
| Units P/L | -2.00u | -3.04u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Setkic
0
O'Connell
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Setkic | O'Connell |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 70.2% | 59.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 65.5% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.1% | 48.7% |
| Aces / Match | 2.5 | 7.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 23.4% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 30.6% | 24.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.7% | 43.2% |
| BP Converted % | 51.9% | 54% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 26.1 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 29.2 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 61.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.2% | 46.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Aldin Setkic and Christopher O'Connell face off in the Round of 32 at Samarkand on Clay.
Aldin Setkic leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Aldin Setkic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Yurii Dzhavakian (Jun 17).
Christopher O'Connell is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Otto Virtanen (Jun 19).
Share this match
