Philip Sekulic vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

π¦πΊPhilip Sekulic
#363 Β· 23 yrs Β· R
1 meeting Β· sets 2β0

πΊπΈStrong Kirchheimer
#717 Β· 31 yrs Β· R
9wPhilip Sekulic and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2026; Philip Sekulic leads 1β0. Across all meetings Sekulic has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 0. Their most recent meeting: Philip Sekulic won at Granby Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Sekulic | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Philip Sekulic | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 58% | 21/36 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Wins a set when losing | 29% | 8/28 | 31% | 9/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 36% | 23/64 | 38% | 21/56 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 49% | 20/41 | 47% | 9/19 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 38% | 8/21 | 48% | 13/27 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 45% | 10/22 | 38% | 10/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 88% | 30/34 | 80% | 20/25 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 62% | 21/34 | 60% | 15/25 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sekulic 1, Kirchheimer 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sekulic
π The Complete Package
Kirchheimer
πΎ All-Court
Matchup analysis
The π The Complete Package archetype wins about 55% vs πΎ All-Court across 281 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Philip Sekulic.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 14, 2026
Granby Challenger
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10β9 | 0β2 |
| Avg odds | 2.07 | 2.86 |
| ROI % | -19.7% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -3.74u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | β |
| Events | 2 | β |
| Matches | 4 | β |
| Distance | 1,545 mi Β· 2,486 km | β |
| Route | VIE β CHN | β |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Sekulic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Kirchheimer's 0%).
| Opponent | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Daniil Glinka | W 61 16 63 | L 36 26 |
| Justin Boulais | L 64 67 46 | L |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Stefan Vujic
M25 Darwin Β· Semifinals
Oct 10
Sam Ryan Ziegann
M25 Darwin Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 9
Ethan Cook
M25 Darwin Β· 2nd Round
Oct 8
Mustafa Ege Sik
M25 Darwin Β· 1st Round
Oct 6
Herman Hoeyeraal
M25 Darwin Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 2
Zaharije-Zak Talic
M25 Darwin Β· 2nd Round
Oct 1
Stefan Storch
M25 Darwin Β· 1st Round
Sep 30
Dalibor Svrcina
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 22
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round
Aug 12
Tyler Zink
Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 2
Enzo Aguiard
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 56β64 matches
| Metric | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 56% | 48% |
| Sets won | 53% | 47% |
| Games won | 52% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.