Philip Sekulic vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Philip Sekulic and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2026; Philip Sekulic leads 1–0. Across all meetings Sekulic has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 0. Their most recent meeting: Philip Sekulic won at Granby Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Sekulic | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Philip Sekulic | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 61% | 19/31 | 55% | 17/31 |
| Wins a set when losing | 24% | 6/25 | 28% | 9/32 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 32% | 18/56 | 37% | 23/63 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 53% | 18/34 | 38% | 8/21 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 35% | 7/20 | 47% | 14/30 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 47% | 9/19 | 46% | 12/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 90% | 26/29 | 82% | 23/28 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 66% | 19/29 | 61% | 17/28 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sekulic 1, Kirchheimer 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sekulic
💥 Big Hitter
Kirchheimer
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Philip Sekulic.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 14, 2026
Granby Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Sekulic | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Philip Sekulic | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| 1 or more | 83% | 5/6 | 100% | 8/8 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 4/6 | 38% | 3/8 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/6 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/6 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/6 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/6 | 0% | 0/8 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–5 | 8–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.25 | 2.05 |
| ROI % | -46.6% | -0.3% |
| Units P/L | -3.26u | -0.03u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Sekulic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Kirchheimer's 33%).
| Opponent | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Daniil Glinka | W 61 16 63 | L 36 26 |
| Atharva Sharma | W 60 60 | W 64 64 |
| James Trotter | L 46 16 | L 67 75 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Clement Chidekh
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Shintaro Mochizuki
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 22
Murphy Cassone
Granby Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Daniil Glinka
Granby Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Strong Kirchheimer
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Patrick Maloney
Newport challenger
Jul 5
Blake Ellis
Cary Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 30
Keegan Smith
Bengaluru 2 Challenger · Final
May 16
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby challenger
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby challenger
Jul 12
Jay Friend
M25 Laval · Quarterfinals
Jul 11
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Miko Lapalme
M25 Laval · 1st Round
Jul 9
Tristan Stringer
M25 Laval · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Miko Lapalme
Futures 2026
Jul 9
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 56–63 matches
| Metric | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 55% | 49% |
| Sets won | 52% | 48% |
| Games won | 51% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Sekulic | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.