Paul Jubb vs Tomas LanikPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- M25 Sharm ElSheikh
- Level
- ITF M25
- Round
- 1st Round
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- September 23 Β· 1:35 AM ET
Book odds
Record at prices like this
At 1.06 or shorter, Paul Jubb has won 18 of 20 (90%). That is level with the 92% the price implied.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Paul Jubb and Tomas Lanik meet next at the M25 Sharm ElSheikh on September 23 on hard.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Jubb | Lanik | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Paul Jubb | Tomas Lanik | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 78% | 28/36 | 92% | 12/13 |
| Wins a set when losing | 48% | 11/23 | 15% | 2/13 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 32% | 19/59 | 12% | 3/26 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 53% | 23/43 | 88% | 7/8 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 6/12 | 33% | 4/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 59% | 13/22 | 33% | 3/9 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 91% | 31/34 | 92% | 12/13 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 28/34 | 92% | 12/13 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Jubb
πͺ Counterpuncher
Lanik
π€ Servebot
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 3,492 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tomas Lanik.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Jubb and Lanik have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Jubb | Lanik | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Paul Jubb | Tomas Lanik | ||
| 1 or more | 82% | 9/11 | 92% | 11/12 |
| 3 or more | 46% | 5/11 | 75% | 9/12 |
| 5 or more | 9% | 1/11 | 58% | 7/12 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 25% | 3/12 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 8% | 1/12 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/12 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Jubb | Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4β5 | 9β5 |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | 1.77 |
| ROI % | -51.0% | -9.6% |
| Units P/L | -4.59u | -1.35u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Jubb | Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 2 |
| Events | 1 | 2 |
| Matches | 1 | 3 |
| Distance | 0 mi Β· 0 km | β |
| Route | JAM | HUN β POL |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Jubb and Lanik posted a 50% win rate.
| Opponent | Jubb | Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| Prasad Ingale | W 60 60 | W 60 62 |
| Ajeet Rai | L 63 36 36 | L 36 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Charles Bertimon
M15 Hurghada Β· Final
Sep 20
Saveliy Ivanov
M15 Hurghada Β· Semifinals
Sep 19
Viktor Frydrych
M15 Hurghada Β· Quarterfinals
Sep 18
S Mert Ozdemir
M15 Hurghada Β· 2nd Round
Sep 17
Sergey Petrov
M15 Hurghada Β· 1st Round
Sep 16
Aradhya Kshitij
M15 Hurghada Β· 2nd Round
Sep 10
Prasad Ingale
M15 Hurghada Β· 1st Round
Sep 9
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Aug 25
Daniil Varaksa
M25 Sharm ElSheikh Β· 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 22
Henry De Keulenaer
M25 Sharm ElSheikh Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 21
David Eichenseher
M15 Szczawno Β· 2nd Round
Sep 3
Alex Huszar
M15 Szczawno Β· 1st Round
Sep 2
John Sperle
M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round
Aug 26
Alexander Wagner
M15 Mistelbach Β· 2nd Round
Aug 20
Jure Siftar
M15 Mistelbach Β· 1st Round
Aug 19
Jure Siftar
M15 Mistelbach Β· 1st Round
Aug 19
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 26β59 matches
| Metric | Jubb | Lanik |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 61% | 50% |
| Sets won | 61% | 51% |
| Games won | 56% | 52% |
