Patrick Zahraj vs Yannik KelmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Patrick Zahraj and Yannik Kelm have met 1 time since 2026; Patrick Zahraj leads 1–0. Across all meetings Zahraj has taken 2 sets to Kelm's 1. Their most recent meeting: Patrick Zahraj won at M25 Metzingen (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Zahraj | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Patrick Zahraj | Yannik Kelm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 20/27 | 88% | 49/56 |
| Wins a set when losing | 27% | 9/33 | 52% | 14/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 27% | 16/60 | 25% | 21/83 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 55% | 16/29 | 72% | 31/43 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 41% | 12/29 | 81% | 26/32 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 36% | 4/11 | 62% | 8/13 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 88% | 23/26 | 88% | 50/57 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 77% | 20/26 | 86% | 49/57 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Zahraj 0, Kelm 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zahraj
🪃 Counterpuncher
Kelm
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 2,464 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Patrick Zahraj.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 25, 2026
M25 Metzingen
C Clay · Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Zahraj | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Patrick Zahraj | Yannik Kelm | ||
| 1 or more | 84% | 16/19 | 43% | 3/7 |
| 3 or more | 63% | 12/19 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 5 or more | 26% | 5/19 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 10 or more | 11% | 2/19 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/19 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/19 | 0% | 0/7 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–8 | 5–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.18 | 1.30 |
| ROI % | +19.0% | -7.0% |
| Units P/L | +3.61u | -0.49u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 4 | — |
| Distance | 461 mi · 742 km | — |
| Route | FRA | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Zahraj and Kelm posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Nemanja Malesevic | L 16 46 | L 46 46 |
| Loann Massard | L 67 57 | L 36 16 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alexandre Reco
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Karl Poling
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Murphy Cassone
St. Tropez Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 21
Mathys Erhard
St. Tropez Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 20
Maxime Janvier
Rennes Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Joshua Sheehy
Rennes Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Samir Banerjee
M25 Plaisir · Semifinals
Sep 12
Mickael Kaouk
M25 Plaisir · Quarterfinals
Sep 11
Tom Sickenberger
M25 Wetzlar · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Aaron Funk
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Deney Wassermann
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 29
Patrick Zahraj
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Johan Nikles
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
David Eichenseher
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
John Hallquist Lithen
M25 Metzingen · 1st Round
Jul 21
Louis Wessels
M25 The Hague · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 60–83 matches
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 45% | 67% |
| Sets won | 46% | 67% |
| Games won | 49% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.