Patrick Zahraj vs Yannik KelmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Patrick Zahraj and Yannik Kelm have met 1 time since 2026; Patrick Zahraj leads 1–0. Across all meetings Zahraj has taken 2 sets to Kelm's 1. Their most recent meeting: Patrick Zahraj won at M25 Metzingen (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Zahraj | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Patrick Zahraj | Yannik Kelm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 71% | 17/24 | 89% | 47/53 |
| Wins a set when losing | 26% | 9/34 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 28% | 16/58 | 26% | 21/80 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 52% | 13/25 | 73% | 30/41 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 37% | 11/30 | 84% | 26/31 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 35% | 6/17 | 64% | 9/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 20/24 | 86% | 48/56 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 71% | 17/24 | 84% | 47/56 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Zahraj 0, Kelm 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zahraj
🧱 The Wall
Kelm
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The ⚔️ The Gladiator archetype wins about 53% vs 🧱 The Wall across 591 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Yannik Kelm.
The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the the wall's elite returner.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 25, 2026
M25 Metzingen
C Clay · Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Zahraj | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Patrick Zahraj | Yannik Kelm | ||
| 1 or more | 92% | 12/13 | 80% | 24/30 |
| 3 or more | 69% | 9/13 | 30% | 9/30 |
| 5 or more | 23% | 3/13 | 3% | 1/30 |
| 10 or more | 8% | 1/13 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/13 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/13 | 0% | 0/30 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–9 | 30–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.84 | 1.48 |
| ROI % | -9.1% | +31.5% |
| Units P/L | -1.27u | +10.72u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 2 | — |
| Distance | 499 mi · 803 km | — |
| Route | SUI → GBR | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Zahraj and Kelm posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Nemanja Malesevic | L 16 46 | L 46 46 |
| Loann Massard | L 67 57 | L 36 16 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Patrick Brady
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Mika Brunold
Sion Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Vincent Marysko
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Raphael Perot
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 28
Raphael Perot
M25 Metzingen · Final
Jul 26
Yannik Kelm
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Max Houkes
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Tomasz Berkieta
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Tom Sickenberger
M25 Wetzlar · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Aaron Funk
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Deney Wassermann
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 29
Patrick Zahraj
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Johan Nikles
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
David Eichenseher
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
John Hallquist Lithen
M25 Metzingen · 1st Round
Jul 21
Louis Wessels
M25 The Hague · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 58–80 matches
| Metric | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 41% | 66% |
| Sets won | 43% | 67% |
| Games won | 48% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Zahraj | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.