Omni Kumar vs Patrick ZahrajPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Omni Kumar and Patrick Zahraj have met 1 time since 2024; Patrick Zahraj leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kumar has taken 1 sets to Zahraj's 2. Their most recent meeting: Patrick Zahraj won at Charlottesville (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kumar | Zahraj | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Omni Kumar | Patrick Zahraj | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 71% | 17/24 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 26% | 9/34 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 28% | 16/58 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 52% | 13/25 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 37% | 11/30 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 35% | 6/17 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 83% | 20/24 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 71% | 17/24 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kumar 0, Zahraj 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kumar
🪃 Counterpuncher
Zahraj
🧱 The Wall
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 55% vs 🧱 The Wall across 753 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Omni Kumar.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the wall's elite returner.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 27, 2024
Charlottesville
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kumar | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–9 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.84 |
| ROI % | - | -9.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.27u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kumar | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 499 mi · 803 km |
| Route | — | SUI → GBR |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Patrick Zahraj
Charlottesville · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 27
Mark Lajal
Sioux Falls · Round of 32
Oct 22
Cooper Woestendick
Sioux Falls · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 21
Jacob Brumm
Sioux Falls · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 20
Tristan Boyer
Las Vegas · Round of 32
Sep 10
Nicholas Godsick
Las Vegas · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 8
Ajeet Rai
Shanghai · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 2
Vadym Ursu
Shanghai · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Patrick Brady
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Mika Brunold
Sion Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Vincent Marysko
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Raphael Perot
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 28
Raphael Perot
M25 Metzingen · Final
Jul 26
Yannik Kelm
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Max Houkes
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Tomasz Berkieta
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 58–58 matches
| Metric | Kumar | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 41% |
| Sets won | - | 43% |
| Games won | - | 48% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kumar | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kumar | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.