Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Nam Hoang Ly vs Tung-Lin WuPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Nam Hoang Ly and Tung-Lin Wu have met 2 times since 2022; they are level 1โ€“1. Their first meeting came at Matsuyama in 2022 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1โ€“1. Across all meetings Ly has taken 2 sets to Wu's 3. Their most recent meeting: Nam Hoang Ly won at Shanghai (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorHoang LyWu
Wins in straight setsโ€”86%
Wins a set when losingโ€”63%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”33%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”66%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”69%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”50%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”81%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”74%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hoang Ly 0, Wu 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Ly

๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Wu

๐Ÿชƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs ๐Ÿชƒ Counterpuncher across 458 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Nam Hoang Ly.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Sep 7, 2023

Shanghai

H Hard ยท Round of 16

36
61
62
Ly

Nov 12, 2022

Matsuyama

H Hard ยท Semifinals

26
57
Wu

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricLyWu
W-L-3โ€“5
Avg odds-1.79
ROI %--49.4%
Units P/L--3.95u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricLyWu
Countriesโ€”1
Eventsโ€”1
Matchesโ€”3
Distanceโ€”โ€”
Routeโ€”TPE

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Ly
LLWLWLLL
L

James McCabe

Busan ยท 1st Round Qualifying

62
57
46

Apr 7

L

Hiroki Moriya

Sydney ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

7763
36
36

Oct 30

W

Matt Hulme

Sydney ยท 1st Round Qualifying

64
63

Oct 29

L

Tristan Schoolkate

Playford ยท Round of 16

63
46
26

Oct 26

W

Matthew Dellavedova

Playford ยท Round of 32

64
63

Oct 24

L

Steven Diez

Shenzhen (Luohu) ยท Round of 32

46
16

Oct 16

L

Aoran Wang

Shenzhen (Longhua) ยท 1st Round Qualifying

36
46

Oct 9

L

Steven Diez

ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai ยท 1st Round Qualifying

62
46
36

Oct 2

Wu
LWWLLLWL
L

Shunsuke Mitsui

M25 Taipei ยท Quarterfinals

647
64
710

Aug 21

W

Hiroki Moriya

M25 Taipei ยท 2nd Round

62
62

Aug 20

W

Taisei Ichikawa

M25 Taipei ยท 1st Round

62
60

Aug 19

L

Coleman Wong

Lincoln Challenger ยท 1st Round

26
26

Jul 14

L

Alex Rybakov

Newport challenger

46
687

Jul 5

L

Yosuke Watanuki

Cary Challenger ยท 2nd Round

36
761
16

Jul 1

W

Justin Boulais

Cary Challenger ยท 1st Round

687
64
763

Jun 30

L

Adam Walton

Tyler Challenger ยท 1st Round

64
647
16

Jun 3

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ Lylevelโ†“ Wu

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 61โ€“61 matches

MetricLyWu
Matches won-61%
Sets won-63%
Games won-55%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageLyWu
ATP Challenger Tour11

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceLyWu
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Nam Hoang Ly vs Tung-Lin Wu FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1โ€“1 over 2 meetings.