Matteo Donati vs Max PurcellPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Matteo Donati and Max Purcell have met 1 time since 2022; Matteo Donati leads 1–0. Across all meetings Donati has taken 2 sets to Purcell's 0. Their most recent meeting: Matteo Donati won at Prague 2 (2022).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Donati | Purcell | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Matteo Donati | Max Purcell | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 90% | 9/10 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 33% | 1/3 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 15% | 2/13 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 80% | 8/10 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 100% | 1/1 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 0% | 0/2 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 91% | 10/11 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 82% | 9/11 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Donati 1, Purcell 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Donati
⚙️ Grinder
Purcell
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Max Purcell.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
May 2, 2022
Prague 2
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Donati | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.26 |
| ROI % | - | -1.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.18u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Donati | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 5 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | JAM |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Rudolf Molleker
Sanremo · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 26
Arthur Fils
Lyon · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 6
Alexis Galarneau
Lyon · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 5
Evan Zhu
Shymkent 2 · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 16
Timur Maulenov
Shymkent 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
May 15
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Shymkent 1 · Round of 32
May 9
Lorenzo Giustino
Prague 2 · Round of 16
May 4
Kaichi Uchida
Prague 2 · Round of 32
May 3
Andy Andrade
Kingston 2 Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 27
Garrett Johns
Kingston 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 26
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 24
Harold Mayot
Kingston 1 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Blaise Bicknell
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Matthew Dellavedova
M15 Wuning · Final
Jun 28
Dong Ju Kim
M15 Wuning · Quarterfinals
Jun 26
Grigoriy Lomakin
M15 Wuning · 2nd Round
Jun 25
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 13–13 matches
| Metric | Donati | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 77% |
| Sets won | - | 75% |
| Games won | - | 64% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Donati | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Donati | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.