Mark Lajal vs Renta TokudaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Mark Lajal and Renta Tokuda have met 1 time since 2026; Mark Lajal leads 1–0. Across all meetings Lajal has taken 2 sets to Tokuda's 0. Their most recent meeting: Mark Lajal won at Wuxi Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Lajal | Tokuda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Mark Lajal | Renta Tokuda | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 53% | 20/38 | 94% | 17/18 |
| Wins a set when losing | 50% | 12/24 | 53% | 9/17 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 48% | 30/62 | 29% | 10/35 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 40% | 18/45 | 74% | 14/19 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 47% | 7/15 | 38% | 5/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 56% | 18/32 | 57% | 4/7 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 81% | 29/36 | 82% | 18/22 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 56% | 20/36 | 77% | 17/22 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Lajal 1, Tokuda 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lajal
🤖 Servebot
Tokuda
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 57% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,280 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Mark Lajal.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
May 4, 2026
Wuxi Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 14–9 | 2–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.79 | 1.45 |
| ROI % | +0.2% | -38.5% |
| Units P/L | +0.05u | -1.54u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 2 | — |
| Distance | 2,012 mi · 3,238 km | — |
| Route | CAN → USA | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Lajal has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Tokuda's 0%).
| Opponent | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Marat Sharipov | W 64 64 | L 36 57 |
| Yu Hsiou Hsu | L 67 76 36 | L 57 06 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati · 1st Round
Aug 14
J.J. Wolf
Vancouver Challenger · Final
Aug 1
Keegan Rice
Vancouver Challenger · Semifinals
Jul 31
Braden Shick
Vancouver Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 30
Clement Chidekh
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Evan Zhu
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Alex Michelsen
Bloomfield Hills Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Bloomfield Hills Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Alexander Rozin
Granby challenger
Jul 12
Shunsuke Nakagawa
M15 Tokyo · 2nd Round
Jun 18
Ryota Tanuma
M15 Tokyo · 1st Round
Jun 16
Shu Matsuoka
M15 Tokyo · 1st Round
Jun 10
Mark Lajal
Wuxi Challenger · 1st Round
May 4
Ognjen Milic
Jiujiang Challenger · 1st Round
Apr 27
Marat Sharipov
Gwangju Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
Apr 20
Woobin Shin
Gwangju Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 19
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 35–62 matches
| Metric | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 61% | 51% |
| Sets won | 57% | 56% |
| Games won | 52% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Lajal | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

