Joshua Sheehy vs Nerman FaticPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Joshua Sheehy and Nerman Fatic have met 1 time since 2026; Nerman Fatic leads 1–0. Across all meetings Sheehy has taken 0 sets to Fatic's 2. Their most recent meeting: Nerman Fatic won at Zagreb Open (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Sheehy | Fatic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Joshua Sheehy | Nerman Fatic | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 73% | 8/11 | 78% | 14/18 |
| Wins a set when losing | 59% | 10/17 | 50% | 8/16 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 46% | 13/28 | 35% | 12/34 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 67% | 6/9 | 69% | 11/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 61% | 11/18 | 65% | 11/17 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 53% | 8/15 | 40% | 4/10 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 77% | 10/13 | 75% | 15/20 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 62% | 8/13 | 70% | 14/20 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sheehy 0, Fatic 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sheehy
🤖 Servebot
Fatic
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 57% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,280 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Joshua Sheehy.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
May 10, 2026
Zagreb Open
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–1 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 1.77 | 2.32 |
| ROI % | -45.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -0.90u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 1 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | CZE |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Sheehy and Fatic posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Keegan Smith | L 36 36 | L 26 64 710 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Christian Langmo
Lincoln challenger
Jul 13
Kelly Giese
Lincoln challenger
Jul 12
Sebastian Gorzny
M25 Dallas · 1st Round
Jul 8
Enzo Aguiard
UAMS Health Little Rock Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 25
Daniel Masur
UAMS Health Little Rock Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Nerman Fatic
Zagreb Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 10
Quinn Vandecasteele
Savannah Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 19
Tyler Zink
Tallahassee Tennis Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 12
Maxim Mrva
Prague Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Keegan Smith
Bundesliga - men
Jul 12
Kyrian Jacquet
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 24
Luka Mikrut
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 19
Elmer Moller
Zagreb Challenger · 1st Round
May 13
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Zagreb Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 11
Joshua Sheehy
Zagreb Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 10
Zdenek Kolar
Ostrava Challenger · Quarterfinals
May 1
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 28–35 matches
| Metric | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 39% | 51% |
| Sets won | 46% | 54% |
| Games won | 49% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Sheehy | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.