Damir Dzumhur vs Nerman FaticPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Damir Dzumhur and Nerman Fatic have met 4 times since 2022; Nerman Fatic leads 3–1. Their first meeting came at Sibiu Challenger in 2022 on clay. On clay courts Fatic leads 3–1. 2 of their meetings have been finals, with Fatic leading those 2–0. Across all meetings Dzumhur has taken 3 sets to Fatic's 7. Their most recent meeting: Damir Dzumhur won at Zagreb Challenger (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Dzumhur | Fatic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Damir Dzumhur | Nerman Fatic | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 50% | 11/22 | 78% | 14/18 |
| Wins a set when losing | 28% | 8/29 | 50% | 8/16 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 37% | 19/51 | 35% | 12/34 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 33% | 5/15 | 69% | 11/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 53% | 18/34 | 65% | 11/17 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 48% | 12/25 | 40% | 4/10 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 15/19 | 75% | 15/20 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 58% | 11/19 | 70% | 14/20 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Dzumhur 0, Fatic 2).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Dzumhur
🛡️ The Spoiler
Fatic
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 407 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Nerman Fatic.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.
Previous meetings
4 career meetings, newest first
Jun 6, 2024
Zagreb Challenger
C Clay · 2nd Round
Sep 24, 2023
Sibiu Challenger
C Clay · Final
Mar 8, 2023
Antalya Challenger
C Clay · 2nd Round
Sep 25, 2022
Sibiu Challenger
C Clay · Final
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–7 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.10 | 2.32 |
| ROI % | -8.1% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.05u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Distance | 0 mi · 0 km | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | POL | CZE |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Dzumhur and Fatic posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Vitaliy Sachko | L 57 46 | L 36 67 |
| Alvaro Guillen Meza | L 26 16 | L 46 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Mathys Erhard
Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 4
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · Final
Jul 18
Alex Molcan
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · Semifinals
Jul 17
Matteo Arnaldi
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · Quarterfinals
Jul 16
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · 2nd Round
Jul 15
Henrique Rocha
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · 1st Round
Jul 13
Zsombor Piros
Iasi Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 8
Maxim Mrva
Prague Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Keegan Smith
Bundesliga - men
Jul 12
Kyrian Jacquet
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 24
Luka Mikrut
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 19
Elmer Moller
Zagreb Challenger · 1st Round
May 13
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Zagreb Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 11
Joshua Sheehy
Zagreb Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 10
Zdenek Kolar
Ostrava Challenger · Quarterfinals
May 1
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 35–55 matches
| Metric | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 42% | 51% |
| Sets won | 43% | 54% |
| Games won | 48% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Finals | 0 | 2 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 3 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Dzumhur | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 3 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.