Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

JiSung Nam vs Marek GengelPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

JiSung Nam and Marek Gengel have met 1 time since 2026; Marek Gengel leads 1–0. Across all meetings Nam has taken 0 sets to Gengel's 2. Their most recent meeting: Marek Gengel won at NovaWorld Phan Thiet Challenger 2 (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorNamGengel
Wins in straight sets75%65%
Wins a set when losing30%45%
Goes to a deciding set28%38%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite80%56%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog46%64%
Tiebreak sets won40%48%
Wins after taking set 173%88%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 155%67%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Nam 0, Gengel 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Nam

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Gengel

👑 The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 54% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 219 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Marek Gengel.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jan 25, 2026

NovaWorld Phan Thiet Challenger 2

H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying

36
46
Gengel

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricNamGengel
W-L-0–1
Avg odds-4.70
ROI %--100.0%
Units P/L--1.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricNamGengel
Countries1
Events1
Matches1
Distance0 mi · 0 km
RouteCZE

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Nam
LLLLWWLL
L

Jan Kumstat

Unicredit Czech Open · 1st Round Qualifying

46
46

May 31

L

Laurent Lokoli

Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · 1st Round Qualifying

57
46

May 24

L

Marat Sharipov

Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · 1st Round Qualifying

36
26

Apr 12

L

Braden Shick

Miyazaki Challenger · 1st Round

46
26

Mar 31

W

Takuya Kumasaka

Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

62
64

Mar 30

W

Yuta Kikuchi

Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · 2nd Round Qualifying

64
64

Mar 30

L

Marek Gengel

NovaWorld Phan Thiet Challenger 2 · 1st Round Qualifying

36
46

Jan 25

L

Kokoro Isomura

Bangkok Open 1 · 1st Round Qualifying

61
6678
46

Jan 4

Gengel
LLLWWLWW
L

Juan Bautista Torres

Prague Challenger · 1st Round

64
36
36

Aug 17

L

Mika Lipp

Bundesliga - men

647
64
1012

Jul 12

L

Milos Karol

Unicredit Czech Open · 2nd Round Qualifying

64
36
36

Jun 1

W

Dusan Obradovic

Unicredit Czech Open · 1st Round Qualifying

64
63

May 31

W

Karl Poling

M25 Louny · 1st Round

16
62
62

May 13

L

Alibek Kachmazov

M25 Sharm ElSheikh · Semifinals

57
36

Apr 25

W

Vadym Ursu

M25 Sharm ElSheikh · Quarterfinals

62
769

Apr 24

W

Alessandro Pecci

M25 Sharm ElSheikh · 2nd Round

64
36
75

Apr 23

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 18–63 matches

MetricNamGengel
Matches won44%68%
Sets won46%63%
Games won52%55%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageNamGengel
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceNamGengel
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

JiSung Nam vs Marek Gengel FAQ

Marek Gengel leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.