Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Garrett Johns vs Max PurcellPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Garrett Johns and Max Purcell have met 1 time since 2026; Max Purcell leads 1–0. Across all meetings Johns has taken 0 sets to Purcell's 2. Their most recent meeting: Max Purcell won at Kingston 2 Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorJohnsPurcell
Wins in straight sets58%90%
Wins a set when losing22%33%
Goes to a deciding set31%15%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite42%80%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog36%100%
Tiebreak sets won33%0%
Wins after taking set 180%91%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 160%82%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Johns 0, Purcell 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Johns

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Purcell

πŸ€– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

The πŸ€– Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Max Purcell.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Aug 26, 2026

Kingston 2 Challenger

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

26
26
Purcell

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeJohnsPurcell
1 or more100%100%
3 or more50%90%
5 or more17%90%
10 or more0%20%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricJohnsPurcell
W-L3–69–2
Avg odds3.081.26
ROI %-16.1%-1.6%
Units P/L-1.45u-0.18u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricJohnsPurcell
Countries11
Events22
Matches35
Distance0 mi Β· 0 km0 mi Β· 0 km
RouteJAMJAM

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Johns
LWLLLLWL
L

Max Purcell

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

26
26

Aug 26

W

Aidan Kim

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

617
63
62

Aug 25

L

Pedro Martinez

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

46
16

Aug 19

L

August Holmgren

Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round

768
26
647

Jul 22

L

Daniil Glinka

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round

627
36

Jul 14

L

Darwin Blanch

Newport Challenger Β· 2nd Round

75
36
36

Jul 10

W

Patrick Maloney

Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
63
64

Jul 9

L

Stefan Kozlov

Newport challenger

46
26

Jul 7

Purcell
LWWLWWWW
L

Andy Andrade

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

36
36

Aug 27

W

Garrett Johns

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

62
62

Aug 26

W

Igor Ribeiro Marcondes

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
62

Aug 24

L

Harold Mayot

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

63
36
46

Aug 19

W

Blaise Bicknell

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
637
63

Aug 18

W

Matthew Dellavedova

M15 Wuning Β· Final

60
61

Jun 28

W

Dong Ju Kim

M15 Wuning Β· Quarterfinals

64
61

Jun 26

W

Grigoriy Lomakin

M15 Wuning Β· 2nd Round

63
62

Jun 25

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 13–59 matches

MetricJohnsPurcell
Matches won46%77%
Sets won44%75%
Games won49%64%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageJohnsPurcell
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceJohnsPurcell
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Garrett Johns vs Max Purcell FAQ

Max Purcell leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.