Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Federico Bondioli vs Sumit NagalPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Federico Bondioli and Sumit Nagal have met 2 times since 2026; Federico Bondioli leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Naples Challenger in 2026 on clay. On clay courts Bondioli leads 2–0. Bondioli has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Bondioli has taken 4 sets to Nagal's 2. Their most recent meeting: Federico Bondioli won at Cordenons Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorBondioliNagal
Wins in straight sets67%68%
Wins a set when losing46%46%
Goes to a deciding set39%40%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite58%24%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog70%60%
Tiebreak sets won59%36%
Wins after taking set 183%70%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 168%56%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bondioli 0, Nagal 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Bondioli

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game
vs

Nagal

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

🎾 All-Court vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 878 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jul 17, 2026

Cordenons Challenger

C Clay · Quarterfinals

16
75
63
Bondioli

Mar 25, 2026

Naples Challenger

C Clay · 2nd Round

62
46
75
Bondioli

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricBondioliNagal
W-L2–14–8
Avg odds2.042.31
ROI %+13.0%-40.3%
Units P/L+0.39u-4.84u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Nagal has a higher win rate against shared opponents (75% vs Bondioli's 25%).

OpponentBondioliNagal
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
L
36
64
16
W
63
63
Cezar Cretu
L
67
36
W
62
64
Jesper de Jong
L
26
64
46
L
75
16
46
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
W
64
76
W
61
63

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Bondioli
LLWWWWLL
L

Federico Arnaboldi

Como Challenger · 1st Round

Aug 31

L

Max Alcala Gurri

Cordenons Challenger · Final

26
06

Jul 19

W

Matyas Fuele

Cordenons Challenger · Semifinals

62
64

Jul 18

W

Sumit Nagal

Cordenons Challenger · Quarterfinals

16
75
63

Jul 17

W

Guido Ivan Justo

Cordenons Challenger · 2nd Round

63
763

Jul 15

W

Alvaro Guillen Meza

Cordenons Challenger · 1st Round

677
63
767

Jul 14

L

Sebastian Baez

Bundesliga - men

46
46

Jul 12

L

Henry Bernet

Trieste Challenger · Quarterfinals

62
687
36

Jul 10

Nagal
LLLLLWLL
L

Luka Mikrut

Braga Challenger · 1st Round

26
46

Oct 7

L

Soon Woo Kwon

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 4

16
26

Sep 19

L

Hyeon Chung

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 2

62
46
57

Sep 18

L

Arthur Gea

U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying

36
647

Aug 25

L

Jan Kumstat

Prague Challenger · 2nd Round

57
36

Aug 19

W

Eduardo Ribeiro

Prague Challenger · 1st Round

765
64

Aug 17

L

Max Houkes

Hamburg Challenger · 1st Round

57
26

Aug 11

L

Jan Kumstat

Liberec Challenger · Semifinals

57
46

Aug 1

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ BondioliBondioli ahead↓ Nagal

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 50–70 matches

MetricBondioliNagal
Matches won60%44%
Sets won58%48%
Games won52%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBondioliNagal
ATP Challenger Tour20

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBondioliNagal
Clay20

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Federico Bondioli vs Sumit Nagal FAQ

Federico Bondioli leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.