Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Facundo Mena vs Ulises BlanchPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Facundo Mena and Ulises Blanch have met 2 times since 2019; Facundo Mena leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Morelos in 2019 on hard. Mena has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Mena has taken 4 sets to Blanch's 1. Their most recent meeting: Facundo Mena won at Santa Fe (2024).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorMenaBlanch
Wins in straight sets72%β€”
Wins a set when losing28%β€”
Goes to a deciding set28%β€”
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite50%β€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog47%β€”
Tiebreak sets won26%β€”
Wins after taking set 191%β€”
Wins 2-0 after taking set 181%β€”

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mena 1, Blanch 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Mena

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Blanch

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

Both Facundo Mena and Ulises Blanch are πŸ’₯ Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 2,644 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jun 8, 2024

Santa Fe

C Clay Β· Semifinals

7763
7765
Mena

Feb 10, 2019

Morelos

H Hard Β· Round of 32

36
75
62
Mena

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricMenaBlanch
W-L5–8-
Avg odds2.13-
ROI %-12.1%-
Units P/L-1.57u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricMenaBlanch
Countries4β€”
Events4β€”
Matches8β€”
Distance1,315 mi Β· 2,117 kmβ€”
RoutePOL β†’ ITA β†’ SUI β†’ GERβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Mena
LWWWWLLL
L

Cezar Cretu

Augsburg Challenger Β· Final

26
06

Aug 29

W

Benito Sanchez Martinez

Augsburg Challenger Β· Semifinals

46
64
766

Aug 28

W

Daniel Masur

Augsburg Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

763
61

Aug 27

W

Kai Wehnelt

Augsburg Challenger Β· 2nd Round

764
75

Aug 26

W

Max Hans Rehberg

Augsburg Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
64

Aug 25

L

Juan Manuel La Serna

Sion Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
36

Aug 18

L

Thomas Faurel

Todi Challenger Β· 1st Round

627
26

Aug 11

L

Tomasz Berkieta

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
617

Aug 3

Blanch
LLLLWLWW
L

Alexander Donski

Pozoblanco Β· Round of 32

36
16

Jul 16

L

Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen

Ibague Β· Round of 32

57
36

Jun 24

L

Leonardo Aboian

Santa Cruz De La Sierra 2 Β· Round of 32

6577
46

Jun 18

L

Dali Blanch

Santa Cruz De La Sierra 2 Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

46
46

Jun 17

W

Aleksandr Lobanov

Santa Cruz De La Sierra 2 Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
64
75

Jun 16

L

Facundo Mena

Santa Fe Β· Semifinals

6377
6577

Jun 8

W

Lautaro Midon

Santa Fe Β· Quarterfinals

64
64

Jun 7

W

Pedro Boscardin Dias

Santa Fe Β· Round of 16

64
64

Jun 5

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ MenaMena ahead↓ Blanch

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 61–61 matches

MetricMenaBlanch
Matches won59%-
Sets won57%-
Games won53%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageMenaBlanch
ATP Challenger Tour20

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceMenaBlanch
Hard10
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Facundo Mena vs Ulises Blanch FAQ

Facundo Mena leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.