Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Daniel Evans vs Kyle EdmundPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Daniel Evans and Kyle Edmund have met 4 times since 2016; Kyle Edmund leads 3โ€“1. Their first meeting came at Dallas in 2016 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1โ€“1. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Edmund leading those 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Evans has taken 3 sets to Edmund's 6. Their most recent meeting: Daniel Evans won at Washington (2022).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorEvansEdmund
Wins in straight sets80%โ€”
Wins a set when losing40%โ€”
Goes to a deciding set30%โ€”
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favorite67%โ€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog67%โ€”
Tiebreak sets won67%โ€”
Wins after taking set 180%โ€”
Wins 2-0 after taking set 180%โ€”

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 3 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Evans 1, Edmund 2).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Evans

๐ŸŽพ All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game
vs

Edmund

๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The ๐ŸŽพ All-Court archetype wins about 56% vs ๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package across 124 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Daniel Evans.

All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

Aug 2, 2022

Washington

H Hard ยท Round of 32

61
62
Evans

Jun 20, 2019

Eastbourne

G Grass ยท Quarterfinals

61
36
46
Edmund

Apr 6, 2017

ATP Masters 1000 Monte-Carlo

C Clay ยท Round of 64

57
16
Edmund

Feb 6, 2016

Dallas

H Hard ยท Final

36
26
Edmund

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricEvansEdmund
W-L1โ€“3-
Avg odds2.55-
ROI %-47.5%-
Units P/L-1.90u-

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Evans
WLLLWLLW
W

Juan Carlos Prado Angelo

Wimbledon ยท 1st Round Qualifying

7762
63

Jun 29

L

Tristan Schoolkate

Wimbledon ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

57
06

Jun 24

L

Marcos Giron

HSBC Championships ยท 1st Round Qualifying

57
62
16

Jun 13

L

Charles Broom

Lexus Ilkley Open ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

62
6779
36

Jun 8

W

James Watt

Lexus Ilkley Open ยท 1st Round Qualifying

64
62

Jun 7

L

Bruno Kuzuhara

UAMS Health Little Rock Open ยท 1st Round Qualifying

26
36

May 24

L

Daniel Jade

Roland Garros ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
46

May 18

W

Oliver Crawford

Guangzhou Challenger ยท 2nd Round

36
767
61

Sep 11

Edmund
LWWWLWLL
L

Jack Pinnington Jones

Nottingham 3 ยท Final

46
6177

Jul 13

W

Hamish Stewart

Nottingham 3 ยท Semifinals

61
64

Jul 12

W

Liam Broady

Nottingham 3 ยท Round of 16

7761
62

Jul 10

W

Tom Hands

Nottingham 3 ยท Round of 32

64
64

Jul 8

L

Zachary Svajda

Ilkley ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

36
36

Jun 9

W

Yasutaka Uchiyama

Ilkley ยท 1st Round Qualifying

62
62

Jun 8

L

Yasutaka Uchiyama

Birmingham ยท 1st Round Qualifying

36
26

Jun 1

L

Blaz Rola

Knoxville ยท 1st Round Qualifying

36
6477

Nov 3

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ EvansEdmund aheadโ†“ Edmund

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 10โ€“10 matches

MetricEvansEdmund
Matches won50%-
Sets won52%-
Games won50%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageEvansEdmund
Finals01
ATP 50010
ATP 25001
ATP Masters 100001
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceEvansEdmund
Hard11
Clay01
Grass01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Daniel Evans vs Kyle Edmund FAQ

Kyle Edmund leads the head-to-head 3โ€“1 over 4 meetings.