Daniel Cox vs Hynek BartonPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Daniel Cox and Hynek Barton have met 1 time since 2024; Daniel Cox leads 1โ0. Across all meetings Cox has taken 2 sets to Barton's 0. Their most recent meeting: Daniel Cox won at Nottingham (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | Cox | Barton | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Daniel Cox | Hynek Barton | ||
| Wins in straight sets | โ | 69% | 33/48 | |
| Wins a set when losing | โ | 45% | 13/29 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | โ | 36% | 28/77 | |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | โ | 52% | 26/50 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | โ | 59% | 13/22 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | โ | 48% | 13/27 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | โ | 80% | 39/49 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | โ | 67% | 33/49 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Cox 1, Barton 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cox
โ๏ธ Grinder
Barton
๐ฅ Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The ๐ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs โ๏ธ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Hynek Barton.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Feb 4, 2024
Nottingham
H Hard ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | Cox | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 11โ8 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.69 |
| ROI % | - | -12.9% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.45u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Cox | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | โ | 2 |
| Events | โ | 2 |
| Matches | โ | 4 |
| Distance | โ | 198 mi ยท 319 km |
| Route | โ | CZE โ GER |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Henry Searle
Glasgow ยท Round of 16
Feb 14
Jerome Kym
Glasgow ยท Round of 32
Feb 13
Leonardo Rossi
Glasgow ยท 2nd Round Qualifying
Feb 12
Andrea Guerrieri
Glasgow ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 11
Marvin Moeller
Nottingham ยท 2nd Round Qualifying
Feb 5
Hynek Barton
Nottingham ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 4
Lukas Klein
Alicante ยท Round of 32
Oct 3
Daniel Cukierman
Alicante ยท 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 2
Benito Sanchez Martinez
Augsburg Challenger ยท Quarterfinals
Aug 27
Juan Manuel La Serna
Augsburg Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Aug 26
Calvin Hemery
Augsburg Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 24
Chun-Hsin Tseng
Prague Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 18
Gonzalo Bueno
Liberec Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Jul 30
Andrej Nedic
Liberec Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jul 28
Maks Kasnikowski
Tampere Challenger ยท Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Tampere Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Jul 22
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 77โ77 matches
| Metric | Cox | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 62% |
| Sets won | - | 60% |
| Games won | - | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Cox | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Cox | Barton |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.