Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Cristian Garin vs Sumit NagalPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Cristian Garin and Sumit Nagal have met 3 times since 2018; Cristian Garin leads 2–1. Their first meeting came at Genova in 2018 on clay. On clay courts Garin leads 2–1. Across all meetings Garin has taken 4 sets to Nagal's 4. Their most recent meeting: Cristian Garin won at Poznan Challenger (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorGarinNagal
Wins in straight sets57%68%
Wins a set when losing69%46%
Goes to a deciding set54%40%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite45%24%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog67%60%
Tiebreak sets won45%36%
Wins after taking set 170%70%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 152%56%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Garin 0, Nagal 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Garin

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Nagal

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

Both Cristian Garin and Sumit Nagal are 🪃 Counterpuncher types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 5,190 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

3 career meetings, newest first

Jun 18, 2025

Poznan Challenger

C Clay · 2nd Round

64
36
64
Garin

Mar 3, 2021

Argentina Open - Buenos Aires

C Clay · 2nd Round

46
36
Nagal

Sep 6, 2018

Genova

C Clay · Round of 16

36
63
64
Garin

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricGarinNagal
W-L2–14–8
Avg odds2.702.31
ROI %+39.7%-40.3%
Units P/L+1.19u-4.84u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 3 shared opponents, both Garin and Nagal posted a 33% win rate.

OpponentGarinNagal
Toby Samuel
L
L
16
67
Henri Squire
L
61
46
36
W
75
36
64
Jesper de Jong
W
75
16
61
L
75
16
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Garin
LLWWLLLL
L

Rafael Jodar

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CHI-ESP · Rubber 2

06
26

Sep 19

L

Toby Samuel

U.S. Open - New York · 3rd Round Qualifying

Aug 27

W

Elias Ymer

U.S. Open - New York · 2nd Round Qualifying

62
765

Aug 26

W

Spencer Johnson

U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying

765
46
76

Aug 24

L

Learner Tien

French Open - Paris · 1st Round

06
62
06
26

May 26

L

Henri Squire

Bitpanda Hamburg Open · 1st Round Qualifying

61
46
36

May 16

L

Lautaro Midon

Oeiras 4 Challenger · 1st Round

36
75
46

May 12

L

Alejandro Davidovich Fokina

Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome · 2nd Round

627
46

May 9

Nagal
LLLLLWLL
L

Luka Mikrut

Braga Challenger · 1st Round

26
46

Oct 7

L

Soon Woo Kwon

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 4

16
26

Sep 19

L

Hyeon Chung

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 2

62
46
57

Sep 18

L

Arthur Gea

U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying

36
647

Aug 25

L

Jan Kumstat

Prague Challenger · 2nd Round

57
36

Aug 19

W

Eduardo Ribeiro

Prague Challenger · 1st Round

765
64

Aug 17

L

Max Houkes

Hamburg Challenger · 1st Round

57
26

Aug 11

L

Jan Kumstat

Liberec Challenger · Semifinals

57
46

Aug 1

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ GarinGarin ahead↓ Nagal

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 39–50 matches

MetricGarinNagal
Matches won54%44%
Sets won53%48%
Games won52%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageGarinNagal
ATP 25001
ATP Challenger Tour20

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceGarinNagal
Clay21

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Cristian Garin vs Sumit Nagal FAQ

Cristian Garin leads the head-to-head 2–1 over 3 meetings.