Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Connor Thomson vs Karl PolingPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Connor Thomson and Karl Poling have met 1 time since 2025; Karl Poling leads 1–0. Across all meetings Thomson has taken 0 sets to Poling's 2. Their most recent meeting: Karl Poling won at Drummondville (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorThomsonPoling
Wins in straight sets75%56%
Wins a set when losing20%35%
Goes to a deciding set22%40%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite0%42%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog60%61%
Tiebreak sets won67%43%
Wins after taking set 1100%84%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%61%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Thomson 0, Poling 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Thomson

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Poling

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents

Matchup analysis

The πŸ’₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 58% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 311 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Connor Thomson.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Nov 10, 2025

Drummondville

H Hard Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

36
16
Poling

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricThomsonPoling
W-L-14–5
Avg odds-2.35
ROI %-+71.0%
Units P/L-+13.50u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricThomsonPoling
Countriesβ€”2
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”6
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”USA β†’ JAM

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Thomson and Poling posted a 0% win rate.

OpponentThomsonPoling
Alex Hernandez
L
26
26
L
57
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Thomson
LLWWWLLW
L

Dusan Obradovic

Memorijal Mile Moralic - Split Open Jolly Autoline Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
26

Mar 2

L

Karl Poling

Drummondville Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

36
16

Nov 10

W

Oliver Bonding

Drummondville Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
64

Nov 9

W

Luca Castagnola

M25 Monastir 8 Β· 2nd Round

627
64
62

Oct 16

W

Yanki Erel

M25 Monastir 8 Β· 1st Round

64
63

Oct 14

L

Maxim Shin

M25 Sharm ElSheikh 4 Β· 1st Round

36
763
26

Oct 1

L

Alec Deckers

M25 Setubal 1 Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Sep 18

W

Giles Hussey

M25 Setubal 1 Β· 1st Round

61
7610

Sep 17

Poling
LWWWWWLW
L

Thomas Fancutt

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
36

Aug 25

W

Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes

M25 East Lansing Β· Final

57
765
64

Aug 16

W

Nikita Filin

M25 East Lansing Β· Semifinals

64
46
764

Aug 15

W

Axel Nefve

M25 East Lansing Β· Quarterfinals

761
64

Aug 14

W

Thomas Fancutt

M25 East Lansing Β· 2nd Round

36
767
61

Aug 13

W

Jesse Flores

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

64
64

Aug 12

L

Kenta Miyoshi

Granby challenger

657
75
57

Jul 13

W

Matt Kuhar

Granby challenger

46
63
63

Jul 12

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 9–65 matches

MetricThomsonPoling
Matches won44%52%
Sets won45%51%
Games won46%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageThomsonPoling
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceThomsonPoling
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Connor Thomson vs Karl Poling FAQ

Karl Poling leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.