Clement Chidekh vs Colin MarkesPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Clement Chidekh and Colin Markes have met 1 time since 2023; Colin Markes leads 1–0. Across all meetings Chidekh has taken 0 sets to Markes's 2. Their most recent meeting: Colin Markes won at Fairfield (2023).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Chidekh | Markes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Clement Chidekh | Colin Markes | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 60% | 28/47 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 38% | 11/29 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 39% | 30/76 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 46% | 23/50 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 67% | 16/24 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 58% | 15/26 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 87% | 39/45 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 62% | 28/45 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Chidekh 0, Markes 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Chidekh
🪃 Counterpuncher
Markes
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 1,208 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 8, 2023
Fairfield
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Chidekh | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.68 | - |
| ROI % | -16.6% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.33u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Chidekh | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 7 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA → JAM | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Valentin Royer
Kingston 1 Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 21
Lautaro Midon
Kingston 1 Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 20
Kenta Miyoshi
Kingston 1 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Jay Clarke
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Cruz Hewitt
M25 Southaven · Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Logan Zapp
M25 Southaven · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Naoki Nakagawa
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Thomas Fancutt
Indian Wells 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 21
Michael Vrbensky
Drummondville · Round of 32
Nov 14
Nicaise Muamba
Drummondville · 2nd Round Qualifying
Nov 13
Kuang Qing Xu
Drummondville · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 12
Alfredo Perez
Fairfield · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 9
Clement Chidekh
Fairfield · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 8
Aidan Mayo
Columbus 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 17
Alex Rybakov
Cary 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 76–76 matches
| Metric | Chidekh | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 62% | - |
| Sets won | 58% | - |
| Games won | 53% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Chidekh | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Chidekh | Markes |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.