Botic van de Zandschulp vs Tallon GriekspoorPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
🇳🇱Botic van de Zandschulp
#41 · 31 yrs · R
6 meetings · sets 5–9
🇳🇱Tallon Griekspoor
#58 · 30 yrs · R
3Botic van de Zandschulp and Tallon Griekspoor have met 6 times since 2019; Tallon Griekspoor leads 4–2. Their first meeting came at Hamburg in 2019 on hard. On hard courts they are level 2–2. Griekspoor has won the last 3 meetings. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Griekspoor leading those 1–0. Across all meetings Zandschulp has taken 5 sets to Griekspoor's 9. Their most recent meeting: Tallon Griekspoor won at Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | van de Zandschulp | Griekspoor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Botic van de Zandschulp | Tallon Griekspoor | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 71% | 20/28 | 72% | 13/18 |
| Wins a set when losing | 44% | 11/25 | 40% | 8/20 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 36% | 19/53 | 34% | 13/38 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 52% | 13/25 | 42% | 8/19 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 70% | 16/23 | 56% | 9/16 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 57% | 13/23 | 45% | 9/20 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 22/28 | 84% | 16/19 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 71% | 20/28 | 68% | 13/19 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (van de Zandschulp 1, Griekspoor 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zandschulp
💥 Big Hitter
Griekspoor
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,932 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
6 career meetings, newest first
Jun 10, 2026
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch
G Grass · 1st Round
Jan 28, 2025
Open Occitanie - Montpellier
H Hard · 1st Round
Jan 18, 2023
Australian Open - Melbourne
H Hard · 2nd Round
Aug 23, 2022
Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem
H Hard · 2nd Round
Jul 18, 2021
Amersfoort Challenger
C Clay · Final
Oct 12, 2019
Hamburg
H Hard · Round of 32
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Zandschulp | Griekspoor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Botic van de Zandschulp | Tallon Griekspoor | ||
| 1 or more | 91% | 19/21 | 100% | 9/9 |
| 3 or more | 76% | 16/21 | 100% | 9/9 |
| 5 or more | 57% | 12/21 | 78% | 7/9 |
| 10 or more | 29% | 6/21 | 22% | 2/9 |
| 15 or more | 14% | 3/21 | 22% | 2/9 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/21 | 0% | 0/9 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 15–7 | 4–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.23 | 2.59 |
| ROI % | +30.4% | +1.3% |
| Units P/L | +6.70u | +0.13u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 3 | 3 |
| Matches | 6 | 3 |
| Distance | 1,611 mi · 2,592 km | 1,611 mi · 2,592 km |
| Route | CHN | CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Griekspoor has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Zandschulp's 40%).
| Opponent | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Denis Shapovalov | W 75 63 | L 46 67 |
| Alexander Zverev | L 26 57 16 | W 67 62 64 |
| Benjamin Bonzi | L 67 46 | W 64 63 |
| Jakub Mensik | L 46 57 | W 63 36 62 |
| Hubert Hurkacz | W 36 76 75 | L 36 67 |
| Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | W 62 36 63 | W 64 64 |
| Quentin Halys | L 16 02 | W 75 76 |
| Karen Khachanov | L 75 46 46 | W 63 57 64 |
| Damir Dzumhur | W 63 63 | W 63 64 |
| Alexander Bublik | L 36 36 | W 63 76 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alex Michelsen
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 2nd Round
Oct 10
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round
Oct 8
Francisco Cerundolo
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round
Oct 1
Jie Cui
China Open - Beijing · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 29
Valentin Royer
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 2nd Round
Sep 25
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, NED-COL 4-0 · Rubber 1
Sep 18
Alexander Zverev
U.S. Open - New York · Quarterfinals
Sep 10
Pavel Kotov
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round
Oct 8
Andrey Rublev
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round
Oct 1
Denis Shapovalov
Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 1st Round
Sep 24
Nicolas Mejia
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, NED-COL 4-0 · Rubber 2
Sep 18
Ben Shelton
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round
Sep 1
Daniel Merida Aguilar
National Bank Open - Montreal · 4th Round
Aug 9
Matteo Arnaldi
National Bank Open - Montreal · 3rd Round
Aug 7
Alexander Zverev
National Bank Open - Montreal · 2nd Round
Aug 5
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 42–64 matches
| Metric | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 55% | 43% |
| Sets won | 54% | 45% |
| Games won | 51% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Finals | 0 | 1 |
| Grand Slam | 0 | 1 |
| ATP 250 | 1 | 2 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Zandschulp | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 2 | 2 |
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
| Grass | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.