Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Simon FreundPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Botic van de Zandschulp and Simon Freund have met 1 time since 2020; Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0. Across all meetings Zandschulp has taken 2 sets to Freund's 0. Their most recent meeting: Botic van de Zandschulp won at Nur-Sultan Challenger (2020).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

Indicatorvan de ZandschulpFreund
Wins in straight sets71%β€”
Wins a set when losing44%β€”
Goes to a deciding set36%β€”
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite52%β€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog70%β€”
Tiebreak sets won57%β€”
Wins after taking set 179%β€”
Wins 2-0 after taking set 171%β€”

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (van de Zandschulp 1, Freund 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Zandschulp

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Freund

🧱 The Wall

Elite returnerLow unforced errorsExtreme consistencyPhysical endurance

Matchup analysis

The πŸ’₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 57% vs 🧱 The Wall across 374 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Botic van de Zandschulp.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the wall's elite returner.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Mar 11, 2020

Nur-Sultan Challenger

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

62
75
Zandschulp

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricZandschulpFreund
W-L15–7-
Avg odds2.23-
ROI %+30.4%-
Units P/L+6.70u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricZandschulpFreund
Countries1β€”
Events3β€”
Matches6β€”
Distance1,611 mi Β· 2,592 kmβ€”
RouteCHNβ€”

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Zandschulp
WWLWWLWL
W

Alex Michelsen

Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai Β· 2nd Round

64
64

Oct 10

W

Daniel Merida Aguilar

Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai Β· 1st Round

16
63
64

Oct 8

L

Francisco Cerundolo

China Open - Beijing Β· 1st Round

75
46
36

Oct 1

W

Jie Cui

China Open - Beijing Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

64
64

Sep 29

W

Valentin Royer

China Open - Beijing Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
62
64

Sep 28

L

Nikoloz Basilashvili

Chengdu Open - Chengdu Β· 2nd Round

46
57

Sep 25

W

Johan Alexander Rodriguez

Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, NED-COL 4-0 Β· Rubber 1

46
61
75

Sep 18

L

Alexander Zverev

U.S. Open - New York Β· Quarterfinals

26
57
16

Sep 10

Freund
LLLLLLL
L

Jose Pereira

Florianopolis Β· 1st Round Qualifying

06
16

Mar 31

L

Conner Huertas del Pino

Asuncion Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
16

Mar 17

L

Maxime Mora

Rennes Β· 1st Round Qualifying

60
46
16

Sep 11

L

Nino Serdarusic

Stockholm Β· 1st Round Qualifying

16
7761
36

Nov 6

L

Botic van de Zandschulp

Nur-Sultan Challenger Β· 2nd Round

26
57

Mar 11

L

Timur Khabibulin

Nur-Sultan Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
763
63

Mar 10

L

Dante Gennaro

Bastad Β· 1st Round Qualifying

26
46

Jul 9

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 64–64 matches

MetricZandschulpFreund
Matches won55%-
Sets won54%-
Games won51%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageZandschulpFreund
ATP Challenger Tour10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceZandschulpFreund
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Simon Freund FAQ

Botic van de Zandschulp leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.