Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Leonardo MayerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Botic van de Zandschulp and Leonardo Mayer have met 1 time since 2021; Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0. Across all meetings Zandschulp has taken 2 sets to Mayer's 1. Their most recent meeting: Botic van de Zandschulp won at Roland Garros (2021).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

Indicatorvan de ZandschulpMayer
Wins in straight sets71%—
Wins a set when losing44%—
Goes to a deciding set36%—
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite52%—
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog70%—
Tiebreak sets won57%—
Wins after taking set 179%—
Wins 2-0 after taking set 171%—

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (van de Zandschulp 0, Mayer 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Zandschulp

💥 Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Mayer

💥 Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

Both Botic van de Zandschulp and Leonardo Mayer are 💥 Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 4,120 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

May 30, 2021

Roland Garros

C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying

26
7764
63
Zandschulp

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricZandschulpMayer
W-L15–7-
Avg odds2.23-
ROI %+30.4%-
Units P/L+6.70u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricZandschulpMayer
Countries1—
Events3—
Matches6—
Distance1,611 mi · 2,592 km—
RouteCHN—

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Zandschulp
WWLWWLWL
W

Alex Michelsen

Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 2nd Round

64
64

Oct 10

W

Daniel Merida Aguilar

Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round

16
63
64

Oct 8

L

Francisco Cerundolo

China Open - Beijing · 1st Round

75
46
36

Oct 1

W

Jie Cui

China Open - Beijing · 3rd Round Qualifying

64
64

Sep 29

W

Valentin Royer

China Open - Beijing · 1st Round Qualifying

46
62
64

Sep 28

L

Nikoloz Basilashvili

Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 2nd Round

46
57

Sep 25

W

Johan Alexander Rodriguez

Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, NED-COL 4-0 · Rubber 1

46
61
75

Sep 18

L

Alexander Zverev

U.S. Open - New York · Quarterfinals

26
57
16

Sep 10

Mayer
LLLLLLLL
L

Marco Trungelliti

Wimbledon · 1st Round Qualifying

46
26

Jun 28

L

Ramkumar Ramanathan

Nottingham 2 Challenger · 1st Round

63
36
617

Jun 15

L

Botic van de Zandschulp

Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying

62
6477
36

May 30

L

Taro Daniel

Oeiras 3 Challenger · 2nd Round

36
46

May 19

L

Juan Ignacio Londero

Oeiras 3 Challenger · 1st Round

46
61
64

May 17

L

Nikola Milojevic

Zagreb Challenger · 2nd Round

647
26

May 12

L

Frederico Ferreira Silva

Zagreb Challenger · 1st Round

63
647
63

May 11

L

Nikola Milojevic

Zagreb · Round of 16

6477
26

May 9

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 64–64 matches

MetricZandschulpMayer
Matches won55%-
Sets won54%-
Games won51%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageZandschulpMayer
Grand Slam10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceZandschulpMayer
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Leonardo Mayer FAQ

Botic van de Zandschulp leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.